In Koons v. Commissioner  Case No. 16-10646 (4/27/2017) the 11th Circuit denied the interest deduction for interest on loan to pay estate tax.

Decedent’s revocable trust included a 70% interest in an LLC which had over $200 million in liquid assets.  The estate’s liquid assets were insufficient to pay the estate tax.  The executors refused the offer of a distribution from the LLC to pay taxes and instead, borrowed $10,750,000 from the LLC at 9.5% interest to pay the tax.  No payment was due for 18 years and the principal and interest were scheduled to be repaid in 14 installments between August 2024 and February 2031.  No prepayments were permitted.

The projected interest was $71,419,497 which was taken as a deduction on the estate tax return.

The IRS claimed a $42,771,586.75 estate tax deficiency and a $15,899,463 generation-skipping tax deficiency.

The estate relied on the Estate of Graegin v. Commissioner, 56 T.C.M. (CCH) 387 (1988)  which permitted interest deductions, holding that  “expense incurred to prevent financial loss to an estate resulting forced sale of its assets to pay estate taxes are deductible administration expenses.”

In Koons, the 11th Circuit held that the interest deduction is properly denied if the estate can pay its tax liability using the liquid assets of an entity but elects to obtain a loan from the entity and then repay the loan using those same liquid assets.

Your marital status on December 31 determines your filing status for the entire preceding year. If you are still married on December 31, you have a choice. You can file jointly with your soon-to-be ex-spouse or file using married filing separately status. You might qualify to file as Head of Household even though you are still married if you have been living apart for the last 6 months of the year.

Unfortunately, using married filing separately status is not very favorable from a tax viewpoint. A joint return usually results in a lower overall tax liability.

If you file a joint return, as far as the IRS is concerned, both you and your spouse are liable for the whole amount of tax due regardless of what any agreement between the spouses states and regardless of who earned the money. This can obviously be a problem. For example, if your self-employed husband has not paid his taxes and you file a joint return with him, the IRS can collect 100% of the tax from you. It does not matter what you have agreed with him, or whether or not you earned the money – filing a joint return produces joint liability. If you are concerned that your spouse might have unreported income or be claiming improper deductions, your best route may be to forego any joint tax return savings and file separately.

There is an exception to joint liability if you can prove you were an "innocent spouse." Let’s say your husband failed to report some of his income. If you didn’t know and had no reason to know about a tax understatement, then you may not be liable. If you know that he is not reporting accurately and you sign the joint return, you are liable.

If your return shows a refund but you owe arrearages in child or spousal support payments, or student loans, all or part of your refund may be used to pay the past-due amount. If you file a joint return and your spouse owes some of these debts, you can prevent your share of a tax refund on a joint return from being applied to a debt owed by your spouse by attaching a completed Form 8379, "Injured Spouse Claim and Allocation", to your return. Also, write "Injured Spouse" in the upper left corner of Form 1040.

If you choose to file separate returns, each spouse reports his or her own income, exemptions, deductions and credits. You each report your own withholding tax from W-2’s. If you and your spouse made estimated tax payments, they may be divided in whatever way you and your spouse agree. If there is no agreement, the IRS will divide them proportionately based on your two respective tax liabilities. If you paid the estimates, some may be credited to your spouse.

The advantage of filing separately is that each spouse is responsible only for the tax due shown on his or her own return. Unfortunately, separate returns often result in overall higher taxes for the couple. If one of you itemizes deductions, the other spouse will not qualify for the standard deduction and, therefore, must also itemize deductions on his/her tax return. If you file separately, you cannot take the credit for child and dependent care expenses, and IRA deductions are reduced.

If you agree to file jointly in order to save overall taxes, you and your spouse can execute an agreement on how to share any tax savings generated by filing a joint return.

If you file separately, you can change your mind, go back and amend to joint returns any time within 3 years of the due date. You cannot go the other way. If you file jointly, you cannot amend to file a separate return.

Did you know you can turn in tax cheats for bounty?

Section 7623 of the Internal Revenue Code authorizes payments for detecting underpayment of tax and detecting and bringing to trial and punishment persons guilty of violating the internal revenue laws or "conniving" (love that word) at the same.


As pointed out by Timothy W. Maier, writing forInsight on the News, offering cash incentives for information about alleged criminals is a time-honored technique. In addition to the IRS, which collects about an additional $100 million from tax cheats annually by paying out rewards anywhere from $2 million to $5 million, the FBI, according to Meier, claims to have captured 140 suspects through its 53-year-old "Most Wanted" program as a result of offering millions in cash. And look at the success of the TV program America’s Most Wanted in bringing criminals to justice.

Maier reminds us that "[r]ewards paid by authorities date back to the Bible when Judas was paid 30 pieces of silver to betray Jesus. They were common in England in the 18th century when thieves were paid for police tips, and they continued to be popular in the Wild West where bounties routinely were offered and paid to gunmen such as Bob Ford, who for $10,000 shot the notorious outlaw Jesse James in the back on April 3, 1882. Today, rewards even are announced to try to throw off police or deceive the public as O.J. Simpson may have done when he offered $1 million to find the "real killers" of Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman."

If you want to report suspected tax fraud, use IRS Form 3949-A, Information Referral. It can be downloaded at, or ordered by calling 1-800-829-3676. The report needs to include specific information about who is being reported, the suspected fraud being reported, how the fraud became known, when it took place, the amount of money involved and any other information that might be helpful in an investigation. You are not required to identify yourself , although it is helpful to do so. The IRS says that your identity can be kept confidential.

You may be entitled to a reward, but keep in mind it is completely discretionary whether you will be given a reward. You have no legal right to a reward. In order to apply for a reward you must file Form 211, Application for Reward for Original Information. The quality of your information is critical because the IRS is swamped with leads – many of them vindictive – things like reports of tax fraud by former spouses and former bosses. The IRS has limited resources and, of course, pursues leads with the best chance of bringing in substantial revenue.

According to IRS Policy Statement 4-27, while the amount of the rewards and whether one is payable at all is completely discretionary, in general , the Service will follow these guidelines:

  •  For specific and responsible information that caused the investigation or, in cases already under audit, materially assisted in the development or identification of an issue or issues and resulted in the recovery, or was a direct factor in the recovery, the reward shall be 15 percent of the amounts the Service recovers, with the total reward not exceeding $10 million.
  • For information that caused the investigation or in cases already under audit, caused an investigation of an issue or issues, and was of value in the determination of tax liabilities although not specific, the reward shall be 10 percent of the amounts the Service recovers, with the total reward not exceeding $10 million.
  • For general information that caused the investigation, but had no direct relationship to the determination of tax liabilities, the reward shall be 1 percent of the amounts recovered, with the total reward not exceeding $10 million. 

How likely are you to get a reward? IRS senior program analyst says "We determined from a study that one in 10 informants actually asks for a reward and approximately one in 10 of those gets one." In fiscal 2002, the IRS paid $7.7 million in rewards that led to $66.9 million in additional collections. There were 6,982 reward claims filed during that period and only 215 rewards allowed in full. Don’t start spending your reward money until you get it.

Just about any word used to describe this behavior has a negative connotation: stool pigeon, tattle-tale, snitch, rat, squealer, informant, fink, whistle-blower. Should you turn in a cheat and a fraud?

Much has been written about the issue in connection with business ethics. Look at the treatment of people who expose wrongdoing in their companies in the media. People who report wrong-doings by their companies are subjected to persecution, pariah status, and blacklisting. They often are ostracized by co-workers, lose their jobs and can’t find work in the same industry.

According to Jim Hillesheim, Professor of Education at The University of Kansas, it is a social fact that honest employees rarely report theft committed by unscrupulous coworkers or managers. Psychologists and behavioral scientists offer various explanations, but the most prevalent one is that the hesitation to report theft is due to fear of being thought of as a tattletale. Reporting a theft or other wrongdoing is seen as a violation of a deeply entrenched code of conduct that demands that one not be thought of as a snitch.

Children get the message that they should not be "tattletales." Years later as adults, when they should be seeing the world in adult terms they are still afraid to come forward. As Hillesheim says, "we need only to ponder how horrible society would be if no one, having witnessed a crime, would step forward to help police, because he or she did not want to be thought of as a tattletale.

Remember, you can come forward with information and not claim reward. What is your motivation, after all?